Help me with my CM0547 Professionalism and Project Management Assignment

Question - Academic Conduct: You must adhere to the university regulations on academic conduct. Formal inquiry proceedings will be instigated if there is any suspicion of misconduct or plagiarism in your work. Refer to the University’s regulations on assessment if you are unclear as to the meaning of these terms. The latest copy is available on the university website. Learning Outcomes assessed by this assignment are: 2. Discuss the issues associated with the needs of continued professional development. 4. To reflect on the student’s individual contribution and performance to the group work in order to develop a strategy for continual professional development. the following areas: Discuss whether the existence of BCS Codes of Conduc ...Read More t and Good Practice could be improved to help you in group work and or your individual assessments on your degree course. b)Reflect on the code of conduct which you created in the first assignment and whether this contributed to the quality of your submission. c)Reflect on your personal contribution to the group assessment and put forward an analysis of whether you were able to use your strengths and overcome your weaknesses. (you may wish to obtain feedback from your group members to inform the content of this section) d)Use the analysis in parts a, b and c above to develop a strategic plan which will support your professional development (you may wish to consider your employability competencies here) in the future.

CM0547 Assignment 2 Assignment documentation guidelines: The documentation required consists of an assignment front page (this is separate from the standard receipting form), the report, and a “marking scheme and feedback form - in that order. Report size: 1500 words (plus or minus 10%), not including a separate reference list page at the end giving details of all references made in the body of the report. Report should contain an introduction, findings, conclusion and recommendations. The pages of the report are the only pages that should be stapled. One staple placed in the top left corner. Images may be used if appropriate, but not gratuitously. Use Times New Roman or similar serif font for text and Arial or similar non-serif font for headings. Font size should be 12 point throughout except for footer. Put your ids and the page number in the footer of each page (not necessary for title page). Footer should be visible but unobtrusive, e.g.in 9 point and grey. Behind the report put a print-out of the feedback form, with your student name and student number. To make your assignment easy to handle for marking, submit it in hard copy, printed single-sided on A4 page. Put it in a cheap plastic “polypocket” that minimizes the bulk of the assignment and lets the assignment title page be seen directly. ! 2

CM0547 Assignment 2 CM0547 Assignment 2, Feedback FormSection GradeDiscussion on Codes of Conduct and Good Practice Very good discussion, relevant, balanced debate and informative but lacked depth at times 12 – 13 marks Evidence of discussion, relevant, with evidence of some balanced debate 10 – 11 marks Mostly descriptive, mostly relevant, with some evidence of balanced debate 8 - 9 marks Descriptive, no discussion, lot of the content irrelevant, not of an acceptable standard 0 – 7 marks Total 20 marks Reflection on the use of the group code of conduct Very good discussion, relevant, balanced debate and informative but lacked depth at times 12 – 13 marks Evidence of discussion, relevant, with evidence of some balanced debate 10 – 11 marks Mostly descriptive, mostly relevant, with some evidence of balanced debate 8-9 marks Descriptive, no discussion, lot of the content irrelevant, not of an acceptable standard 0 – 7 marks Total 20 marks Reflection on the student’s contribution to the group assignment Very good discussion, relevant, balanced debate and informative but lacked depth at times 12 – 13 marks Evidence of discussion, relevant, with evidence of some balanced debate 10 – 11 marks Mostly descriptive, mostly relevant, with some evidence of balanced debate 8 - 9 marks Descriptive, no discussion, lot of the content irrelevant, not of an acceptable standard 0 – 7 marks Total 20 marks Development of a strategy to inform the student’s professional development Very good discussion, relevant, balanced debate and informative but lacked depth at times 12 - 13 marks Evidence of discussion, relevant, with evidence of some balanced debate 10 - 11 marks Mostly descriptive, mostly relevant, with some evidence of balanced debate 8 - 9 marks Descriptive, no discussion, lot of the content irrelevant, not of an acceptable standard 0 - 7 marks Total 20 marksStructure and presentation appropriate academic style is used throughout. The length of the essay is acceptable. 7 - 10 marks A well-defined structure is evident, appropriate language and academic style is used throughout. The length of the essay is acceptable. 5 -7 marks An attempt at a structure has been made but not necessarily achieved. Some errors in language and style are evident. 4 – 6 marks Poor attempt at a structure has been made presentation is below the standard acceptable. 0 – 3 marks Total Marks 10Use of academic texts, journals and periodicals All references are correctly presented to an appropriate academic style. 7 – 10 marks It is evident that a wide range of text, journals and periodicals have been used within the essay construction but there are one or two errors in the presentation of the citations. 5 – 7 marks Limited citations are evident in the work. References are absent or inappropriately presented within the work. 1 – 4 marks No references are presented in the work. 0 marks Total Marks 10Overall Comments Merely Page ! 3 ...Read Less

Solution Preview - of Conduct Improvement of BCS Code of Conduct and Good Practice The BCS Code of Conduct and good practice specifies the certified standards obligatory by the British Computer Society as a stipulation of membership (Doyle, 2000; Duquenoy, Jones, & Blundell, 2008). This code applies to members of all capacities, including affiliates and studen

Original Question Documents

N/A