+1-817-968-5551
+61-488-839-671
+44-7480-542904About Expert
Requirement
Analyze the article/case study from the perspective of at least two different classical ethical theories, one of which must be that of "Deontological". Present well-reasoned arguments for your assessments and recommendations.
Write an overall conclusion that justifies your recommendations made in your essay.
Rent-a-hacker site leaks Australian buyers' names and addresses
The given article highlights the incident of hackers being hired by different people from Sweden to Australia for a variety of purposes. The purpose of that hiring were legal and illegal as well, at least on the face of it. However, the actual embarrassment began when it was discovered that the hacking job description was linked to the personal information of the clients and because of that their identification was disclosed. The question that arises here is whether the hacking per se is completely moral and unethical or could it be serving any rightful purpose at the end?
Are you looking for essay writing help from reliable service providers? The professional experts of Allassignmenthelp.com can provide you a plagiarism-free essay assignments help. All you have to say is do my essay and you will have well-written essays that will earn you the highest grades.
This particular incident, like any other act, could be seen from different perspectives depending on what one wants to look at it. Let us analyze it from the perspective of the theory of consequentialism and deontology. It is one’s own discretion what decision is he going to make irrespective of the rightness or wrongness of it. As per my own opinion, hacking in itself is morally wrong as it is a deliberate act of destroying something that has been created by someone or stealing information that could be extremely crucial for a particular person. In relation to this Immanuel Kant believed that the moral and ethical values are the guiding posts in daily decision making. The deontological theory of ethics states that the morality of any action adheres to the closest degrees of rules or duties (Alexander & Moore, 2007). In other words, a deontological approach is essentially rule-based ethics because the rules bind any person to his/her duty. In the present scenario, the Australian buyers asked the hackers to find out for them whether their spouses were cheating on them. They might have taken such a decision out of frustration because they couldn’t have found any other means to find out about it. However, such an action on their part, according to me, was ethically wrong because this act of taking a hacker’s help in itself is cheating as it is immoral to try to get illegal access to someone else’s account. As we know, according to Kant, the wrongness or rightness depends upon the commitment towards duty not on the consequences of the actions. Kant further goes on to suggest that if a person decides something and performs the action based on that decision, then it is also very crucial to understand that would they like the other person to act in a likewise manner. Whether something good results out of that action would still not justify the deviation from the path of morality if it wasn’t done as per the rules and duties. So, in the ambit of deontological morality, such a person would always like to abstain from taking such actions.
If a person wants to know the inside information business strategies and customer database of his rival and employs a hacker to do this job for him, then again he is not going according to the universal laws of morality because it is not done following the rules and duty (Spafford, 1992). So, the moot point that is to be made over here is that any form of hacking whether it is done in order to bring out some relevant or important information is still be considered an immoral and unethical act. It may bring about some positive results to a particular person or anything substantial for the society at large, but the fact that it has not been done by following the requisite principles of duty and rules, it will always be considered as an immoral act.
The other theory with which the above hacking incident could be understood in a different perspective is the Consequentialist theory of morality. The theory states that any action is ethical or moral is based on the consequences of that action as every action has consequences. It is the consequence that makes a clear distinction about the rightness or wrongness of an action. In plain and simple words we can say that the end justifies the means (Sinnott-Armstrong, 2003). Now, in relation to the hacking incident, there is a clear dichotomy that emerges at this point. As per consequentialism, hacking is something irrespective of whether it is guided by the moral principles or not, it will be considered wrong whenever it is intended to hurt someone because by the very act of hacking, there could be grave consequences for a person’s life or for the system as a whole. However, the picture changes completely when the hacking is done to bring out positive results so that people get benefit from that. So, in this case, even if it is seemingly an immoral act but the consequences are coming out to be positive. Then, it will become a moral and ethical act in the end. Likewise in the present hacking scenario, the Australian woman must have been fed up of her husband’s behavior and could not have figured out any other way as to what was going on and she decided to take hackers’ help. So, as per the theory of consequentialism, she would have known the reality and must have benefited by it, that is, the consequences for her were positive by the very act of hacking. Therefore, in this case, it is morally right thing to do. Also, if hacking has been carried out to know about the impending threats for one’s country and how to make preparations to defend it, then clearly its consequences will always be positive and we can safely conclude that the particular act was morally right (Coleman, 2013).
Hence, it boils down the basic approach as to how one sees any action being performed around him/her. Morality and ethics are bound to one’s own discretion. How an individual interprets a particular action is always guided by the principles that he thinks are applicable at that instant.
Rationale Diagram
Place Order For A Top Grade Assignment Now
We have some amazing discount offers running for the students
Place Your OrderReferences
-
Alexander, L. & Moore, M. (2007). Deontological Ethics. Plato.stanford.edu. Retrieved 15 September 2016, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/
-
Coleman, E. (2013). Coding freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2003). Consequentialism. Plato.stanford.edu. Retrieved 15 September 2016, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/
-
Spafford, E. (1992). Are computer hacker break-ins ethical?. Journal Of Systems And Software, 17(1), 41-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(92)90079-y
Give your grades a boost
Just share your requirements and get customized solutions on time.
-
1,168,768 Orders
-
4.9/5 Overall Rating
-
5,052 Experts
